Farm Subsidy information
King George County, Virginia
Total Subsidies in King George County, Virginia, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 54
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in King George County, Virginia totaled $1,040,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Mount View Family Limited Partnership Llp | King George, VA 22485 | $4,285 |
22 | C Latane Bowie | Colonial Beach, VA 22443 | $4,135 |
23 | J C Owens Jr | King George, VA 22485 | $3,222 |
24 | Elaine Grigsby-arnade | Oakton, VA 22124 | $2,998 |
25 | Aesland Farms | Prairie, MS 39756 | $2,759 |
26 | James Pitts | King George, VA 22485 | $2,537 |
27 | Ashton Family Partnership | King George, VA 22485 | $2,528 |
28 | Poplar Ridge Farm LLC | King George, VA 22485 | $2,339 |
29 | Myrtle Dudley | King George, VA 22485 | $2,257 |
30 | Janet Gayle Harris | King George, VA 22485 | $2,193 |
31 | Sherri Spillman | King George, VA 22485 | $2,044 |
32 | Wendell Laposata | King George, VA 22485 | $2,041 |
33 | Connie A Quattlebaum | King George, VA 22485 | $1,918 |
34 | John G King | King George, VA 22485 | $1,721 |
35 | Anna Clarke Sas | Virginia Beach, VA 23452 | $1,588 |
36 | F Glenwood Howland | King George, VA 22485 | $1,299 |
37 | Phillip Joseph Rollins | King George, VA 22485 | $1,297 |
38 | D. A. Allen Farms | Champlain, VA 22438 | $1,135 |
39 | Larry S Weedon | King George, VA 22485 | $1,126 |
40 | James W Norris | King George, VA 22485 | $939 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”