Conservation Reserve Program in King George County, Virginia, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 25
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in King George County, Virginia totaled $43,415 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Turning Point Support Foundation | Lakeside, CA 92040 | $8,740 |
| 2 | Elena Ellis | Dogue, VA 22451 | $5,526 |
| 3 | Mount View Family Limited Partnership Llp | King George, VA 22485 | $4,285 |
| 4 | Elaine Grigsby-arnade | Oakton, VA 22124 | $2,998 |
| 5 | Ashton Family Partnership | King George, VA 22485 | $2,528 |
| 6 | Janet Gayle Harris | King George, VA 22485 | $2,193 |
| 7 | Wendell Laposata | King George, VA 22485 | $2,041 |
| 8 | Connie A Quattlebaum | King George, VA 22485 | $1,918 |
| 9 | John G King | King George, VA 22485 | $1,721 |
| 10 | Anna Clarke Sas | Virginia Beach, VA 23452 | $1,588 |
| 11 | Phillip Joseph Rollins | King George, VA 22485 | $1,297 |
| 12 | F Glenwood Howland | King George, VA 22485 | $1,038 |
| 13 | James W Norris | King George, VA 22485 | $939 |
| 14 | Nancy Roan Grapes | King George, VA 22485 | $784 |
| 15 | Wmm Farms Inc | King George, VA 22485 | $673 |
| 16 | David Schneider | King George, VA 22485 | $669 |
| 17 | Poplar Ridge Farm LLC | King George, VA 22485 | $648 |
| 18 | Myrtle Dudley | King George, VA 22485 | $618 |
| 19 | Paul G. Atkinson | King George, VA 22485 | $608 |
| 20 | John P Burchell | Colonial Beach, VA 22443 | $573 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf