Production Flexibility Program in King George County, Virginia, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 113
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in King George County, Virginia totaled $1,447,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Herbert Wilkerson & Son Inc | Colonial Beach, VA 22443 | $282,720 |
2 | Robert R Morgan Jr | King George, VA 22485 | $258,206 |
3 | Kermit P Thomas Jr | Port Royal, VA 22535 | $177,187 |
4 | John F Davis | Port Royal, VA 22535 | $53,788 |
5 | Lawrence E Carr Jr | King George, VA 22485 | $44,922 |
6 | Waterloo Farms | King George, VA 22485 | $44,634 |
7 | W Thomas Hicks | Rappahannock Academy, VA 22538 | $38,334 |
8 | Jane Mcdaniel | King George, VA 22485 | $36,736 |
9 | E Miles Hastings | Dogue, VA 22451 | $32,852 |
10 | Ruth C Morie | King George, VA 22485 | $27,989 |
11 | Andrew Lee Frank | King George, VA 22485 | $25,209 |
12 | Rodney D Rollins | Colonial Beach, VA 22443 | $21,418 |
13 | Alvin R Tate | Colonial Beach, VA 22443 | $20,493 |
14 | R G Strother | King George, VA 22485 | $20,366 |
15 | Tate And Tate Inc | Colonial Beach, VA 22443 | $19,700 |
16 | Robert Chambers | Mine Run, VA 22508 | $17,703 |
17 | Sutton & Henderson | Fredericksburg, VA 22405 | $16,988 |
18 | Lawrence Deceased Carr | King George, VA 22485 | $15,661 |
19 | Frank B Taylor | King George, VA 22485 | $14,447 |
20 | Perry G Bowen III | Jersey, VA 22481 | $13,282 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>