Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in King George County, Virginia, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 35
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in King George County, Virginia totaled $255,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Herbert Wilkerson & Son Inc | Colonial Beach, VA 22443 | $73,511 |
2 | Cloverfield Enterprises | Champlain, VA 22438 | $54,195 |
3 | Tate And Tate Inc | Colonial Beach, VA 22443 | $31,431 |
4 | River Farm Va LLC | King George, VA 22485 | $13,984 |
5 | Wmm Farms Inc | King George, VA 22485 | $11,694 |
6 | Mill Creek Farms LLC | Port Royal, VA 22535 | $11,404 |
7 | Johan Lagerkvist | Milford, VA 22514 | $11,314 |
8 | C Latane Bowie | Colonial Beach, VA 22443 | $10,928 |
9 | Lewis Alexander Ashton III | King George, VA 22485 | $8,389 |
10 | Jane Mcdaniel | King George, VA 22485 | $5,496 |
11 | Johan Lagerkvist | King George, VA 22485 | $2,426 |
12 | Ellis Farms Inc | Champlain, VA 22438 | $2,283 |
13 | J C Owens Jr | King George, VA 22485 | $2,004 |
14 | Robert Arthur Owens | Fredericksburg, VA 22408 | $1,743 |
15 | Agnes M Williams | King George, VA 22485 | $1,683 |
16 | John Cleveland Owens | King George, VA 22485 | $1,428 |
17 | Wilma Ward | King George, VA 22485 | $1,398 |
18 | Kermit P Thomas Jr | Port Royal, VA 22535 | $1,288 |
19 | Laurence A Ball | King George, VA 22485 | $1,177 |
20 | Thomas W Berry Jr | King George, VA 22485 | $1,122 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>