Emergency Conservation Program in Prince George County, Virginia, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 47
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Prince George County, Virginia totaled $94,023 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | George Zahradka | Petersburg, VA 23805 | $9,975 |
2 | S & J Farms LLC | Disputanta, VA 23842 | $7,547 |
3 | W D Kreider | North Prince George, VA 23860 | $5,581 |
4 | R E Hoffler | Mclean, VA 22101 | $4,563 |
5 | Raymond P Rusnak Jr | Disputanta, VA 23842 | $3,622 |
6 | Tanju Karen Sonuparlak | North Prince George, VA 23860 | $3,512 |
7 | James E Kanusek | Disputanta, VA 23842 | $3,396 |
8 | Alex W Bresko Jr | Disputanta, VA 23842 | $3,000 |
9 | J H Burrow Jr | Disputanta, VA 23842 | $2,998 |
10 | Barry Ray Collier | Williamsburg, VA 23185 | $2,868 |
11 | John Petik Sr | Prince George, VA 23875 | $2,747 |
12 | Mary M Vinsh | Sarasota, FL 34231 | $2,537 |
13 | Gerald B Nicely | Disputanta, VA 23842 | $2,210 |
14 | Edward Harvanek | Disputanta, VA 23842 | $2,175 |
15 | Henry H Harrison III | Prince George, VA 23875 | $2,161 |
16 | Ben Kanak | Prince George, VA 23875 | $2,151 |
17 | Warren B Clements | Disputanta, VA 23842 | $2,019 |
18 | Old Brandon Farm LLC | South Prince George, VA 23805 | $2,003 |
19 | Paul W Cerny Jr | Petersburg, VA 23805 | $1,870 |
20 | Harry Hopkins | Disputanta, VA 23842 | $1,715 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>