Farm Subsidy information
Westmoreland County, Virginia
Total Subsidies in Westmoreland County, Virginia, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 114
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Westmoreland County, Virginia totaled $2,157,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | B & S Farms Inc | Montross, VA 22520 | $105,301 |
| 2 | Robert B Gillions & Son LLC | Hague, VA 22469 | $100,018 |
| 3 | Fairview Farms Inc | Kinsale, VA 22488 | $78,326 |
| 4 | Robert H Gawen & Sons Inc | Hague, VA 22469 | $47,847 |
| 5 | C Latane Bowie | Colonial Beach, VA 22443 | $38,994 |
| 6 | Nomini Farms LLC | Warsaw, VA 22572 | $35,138 |
| 7 | Laurel Springs Grains Corp | Montross, VA 22520 | $29,188 |
| 8 | Hutt Farms | Montross, VA 22520 | $24,656 |
| 9 | Charles Bowie | Oak Grove, VA 22443 | $24,119 |
| 10 | John H Jones | Montross, VA 22520 | $20,054 |
| 11 | J And S Farm Inc | Montross, VA 22520 | $18,850 |
| 12 | Louis Fairfax Chandler | Montross, VA 22520 | $18,479 |
| 13 | Donald Gawen Farming LLC | Hague, VA 22469 | $18,426 |
| 14 | Heritage Farm LLC | Warsaw, VA 22572 | $12,427 |
| 15 | Kermit P Thomas Jr | Port Royal, VA 22535 | $11,518 |
| 16 | Carl Lee Tate | Hague, VA 22469 | $10,896 |
| 17 | Charles T Griffith | Norfolk, VA 23507 | $10,765 |
| 18 | William C Jones II | Montross, VA 22520 | $10,110 |
| 19 | Craig Brann Farms Inc | Warsaw, VA 22572 | $10,031 |
| 20 | Monrovia Farm LLC | Colonial Beach, VA 22443 | $9,723 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf