Conservation Reserve Program in Washington, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 5,980
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Washington totaled $69,106,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Community First Bank ** | Kennewick, WA 99336 | $483,733 |
| 2 | Northwest Farm Credit Service ** | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $466,376 |
| 3 | Wheatland Bank ** | Davenport, WA 99122 | $397,041 |
| 4 | Wheatlife Farms Gp | Colfax, WA 99111 | $394,784 |
| 5 | Washington Trust Bank ** | Pullman, WA 99163 | $371,679 |
| 6 | Glacier Bank ** | Choteau, MT 59422 | $356,586 |
| 7 | Gesa Credit Union ** | Richland, WA 99352 | $342,267 |
| 8 | Columbia State Bank ** | Redmond, OR 97756 | $341,674 |
| 9 | Zmi Joint Venture | Washougal, WA 98671 | $267,790 |
| 10 | Broughton Land Co | Dayton, WA 99328 | $242,005 |
| 11 | Andrews & Rowell | Prosser, WA 99350 | $221,564 |
| 12 | Banner Bank ** | Yakima, WA 98902 | $210,870 |
| 13 | Phillips Jv | Harrington, WA 99134 | $204,455 |
| 14 | H-4 Farms Partnership | Kahlotus, WA 99335 | $196,944 |
| 15 | Woodward Canyon Land Co II | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $194,872 |
| 16 | J Hair Farms Partnership | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $184,189 |
| 17 | Cline Clyde Ranch | Vancouver, WA 98687 | $170,770 |
| 18 | The Berg Partnership | Paterson, WA 99345 | $159,112 |
| 19 | L & S Bruce Family Partnership | Lacrosse, WA 99143 | $155,467 |
| 20 | Wiswall Ag Partnership | Pasco, WA 99301 | $153,375 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf