Total Conservation Programs in Washington, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 6,006
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Washington totaled $69,253,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Lang-mour Joint Venture | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $150,000 |
22 | B & B Farms | Kennewick, WA 99336 | $148,631 |
23 | Van Buren Farms Jv | Pasco, WA 99301 | $147,101 |
24 | Adams Farm Partnership | Coulee City, WA 99115 | $145,489 |
25 | Agamerica Lending ** | Cleveland, OH 44193 | $145,101 |
26 | Blankenship Brothers Joint Venture | Washtucna, WA 99371 | $141,962 |
27 | S & H Joint Venture | Yakima, WA 98908 | $141,854 |
28 | Moore 2 Farms Gp | Lacrosse, WA 99143 | $141,342 |
29 | Coordes Farms Joint Venture | Eltopia, WA 99330 | $138,231 |
30 | Kaysons Partnership | Connell, WA 99326 | $136,578 |
31 | Isaak Brothers | Coulee City, WA 99115 | $135,885 |
32 | Schmitt Farms | Prosser, WA 99350 | $133,949 |
33 | B & T Farms | Prosser, WA 99350 | $133,171 |
34 | Baker Boyer Bank ** | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $130,347 |
35 | Jrs Joint Venture | Cheney, WA 99004 | $130,108 |
36 | Galbreath Brothers Jv | Ritzville, WA 99169 | $123,624 |
37 | Grimm-davis Farms | Chesterfield, MO 63005 | $120,208 |
38 | Walla Walla Farms Partnership | Sterling, CO 80751 | $116,565 |
39 | Barnwell Farms Joint Venture | Victoria, TX 77904 | $113,118 |
40 | Firewater Ranch Partnership | Moxee, WA 98936 | $110,652 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”