Subtotal, Conservation Programs in Washington, 2018
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 6,324
Recipients of Subtotal, Conservation Programs from farms in Washington totaled $77,031,000 in in 2018.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Subtotal, Conservation Programs 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Three Bowe Farms * | Prescott, WA 99348 | $458,200 |
| 2 | Wheatlife Farms Gp * | Colfax, WA 99111 | $435,158 |
| 3 | Andrews & Rowell * | Prosser, WA 99350 | $293,624 |
| 4 | H-4 Farms Partnership * | Kahlotus, WA 99335 | $292,337 |
| 5 | Zmi Joint Venture * | Washougal, WA 98671 | $266,776 |
| 6 | Phillips Jv * | Harrington, WA 99134 | $258,213 |
| 7 | Broughton Land Co * | Dayton, WA 99328 | $253,816 |
| 8 | Walla Walla Farms Partnership * | Sterling, CO 80751 | $229,760 |
| 9 | Blankenship Brothers Joint Ventur * | Washtucna, WA 99371 | $217,201 |
| 10 | B & B Farms * | Kennewick, WA 99336 | $203,192 |
| 11 | Cline Clyde Ranch * | Vancouver, WA 98687 | $198,419 |
| 12 | Woodward Canyon Land Co II * | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $194,872 |
| 13 | J Hair Farms Partnership * | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $183,386 |
| 14 | Moore 2 Farms Gp * | Lacrosse, WA 99143 | $178,541 |
| 15 | G & L Farms Gp * | Benge, WA 99105 | $174,757 |
| 16 | Sharpe Family Partnership * | Lacey, WA 98516 | $170,729 |
| 17 | L & S Bruce Family Partnership * | Lacrosse, WA 99143 | $168,290 |
| 18 | The Berg Partnership * | Paterson, WA 99345 | $160,844 |
| 19 | Klg Farms Inc. * | Odessa, WA 99159 | $160,200 |
| 20 | Wiswall Ag Partnership * | Pasco, WA 99301 | $159,485 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
‡ Data for 2020 includes payments made by USDA through June 30, 2020 and does not include crop insurance premium subsidies.
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf