Counter Cyclical Program in Douglas County, Washington, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 765
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Douglas County, Washington totaled $223,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Billingsley Ranch | Palisades, WA 98845 | $10,872 |
2 | Billingsley Ranch | Palisades, WA 98845 | $9,418 |
3 | Jorgensen Farms Joint Venture | Coulee City, WA 99115 | $6,997 |
4 | Ludeman Farms Inc | Waterville, WA 98858 | $5,152 |
5 | Irmer Farms | Waterville, WA 98858 | $5,143 |
6 | Adams Farm Partnership | Coulee City, WA 99115 | $5,098 |
7 | Clarmar Farms Inc | Waterville, WA 98858 | $4,870 |
8 | Jorgensen Brothers Joint Venture | Coulee City, WA 99115 | $4,796 |
9 | Nelson Farms Joint Venture | Waterville, WA 98858 | $4,511 |
10 | Brandt Farms Joint Venture | Waterville, WA 98858 | $4,239 |
11 | Rock Farms Inc | Waterville, WA 98858 | $3,626 |
12 | L & M Joint Venture | Waterville, WA 98858 | $3,352 |
13 | Rinker Farms Joint Operation | Waterville, WA 98858 | $3,262 |
14 | Kenneth D Ehlers | Grand Coulee, WA 99133 | $2,738 |
15 | Shiloh G Jorgensen | Coulee City, WA 99115 | $2,501 |
16 | Jacobsen Farms Inc | Waterville, WA 98858 | $2,460 |
17 | Matthiesen Farms Inc | Mansfield, WA 98830 | $2,339 |
18 | Buob Farms | Coulee City, WA 99115 | $2,301 |
19 | Alice F Zones | Waterville, WA 98858 | $2,267 |
20 | Lee Roy Jordan | Waterville, WA 98858 | $2,242 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>