Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Klickitat County, Washington, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 120
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Klickitat County, Washington totaled $3,548,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Andrews & Rowell | Prosser, WA 99350 | $231,564 |
2 | J & L Farms | Bickleton, WA 99322 | $194,400 |
3 | Doubletree Ranches Inc | Bickleton, WA 99322 | $181,602 |
4 | Diamond J Farms Inc | Bickleton, WA 99322 | $175,475 |
5 | Powers Ranches Inc | Roosevelt, WA 99356 | $143,092 |
6 | Naught Ranches Inc | Bickleton, WA 99322 | $141,941 |
7 | Beeks Ranches Inc | Roosevelt, WA 99356 | $136,712 |
8 | Glade Creek Ranch | Prosser, WA 99350 | $130,604 |
9 | Terry L Linden | Goldendale, WA 98620 | $120,337 |
10 | Ben Mc Bride | Bickleton, WA 99322 | $112,770 |
11 | White Ranch Inc | Roosevelt, WA 99356 | $100,290 |
12 | Stephen N Matsen | Bickleton, WA 99322 | $96,708 |
13 | Scott Wilkins | Goldendale, WA 98620 | $89,761 |
14 | Brynn Marie Matsen | Bickleton, WA 99322 | $80,231 |
15 | Jensen Seed Farm Inc | Bickleton, WA 99322 | $77,119 |
16 | Cameron Bros | Centerville, WA 98613 | $67,396 |
17 | Robert G Imrie Estate | Portland, OR 97202 | $64,783 |
18 | 101 Bar Ranch LLC | Spokane, WA 99208 | $52,632 |
19 | William Mains | Bickleton, WA 99322 | $48,687 |
20 | Helen T Mains | Bickleton, WA 99322 | $48,687 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>