Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Spokane County, Washington, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 774
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Spokane County, Washington totaled $6,386,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Boulder Creek Inc | Spangle, WA 99031 | $208,549 |
| 2 | Spokane Hutterian Brethren Inc | Reardan, WA 99029 | $192,359 |
| 3 | Emtman Bros Farms Jv | Valleyford, WA 99036 | $143,409 |
| 4 | G M Farms | Latah, WA 99018 | $116,392 |
| 5 | T & T Jv | Fairfield, WA 99012 | $114,710 |
| 6 | D & M Farms Gp | Rosalia, WA 99170 | $114,644 |
| 7 | Wernz Farming LLC | Fairfield, WA 99012 | $104,375 |
| 8 | Mike & Regina Clausen Ranch Jv | Rosalia, WA 99170 | $101,431 |
| 9 | Amd Farms Inc | Spangle, WA 99031 | $98,281 |
| 10 | Td Walsh Farms Inc | Colbert, WA 99005 | $83,812 |
| 11 | D W Cornwall Farms Inc | Fairfield, WA 99012 | $83,790 |
| 12 | Janson Farms Inc | Latah, WA 99018 | $82,976 |
| 13 | Overtime Farms Inc | Spangle, WA 99031 | $79,718 |
| 14 | Slr Farms Inc | Rosalia, WA 99170 | $78,010 |
| 15 | Goose Flat Farms Inc | Spangle, WA 99031 | $72,421 |
| 16 | Pottratz & Tiegs Farms Joint Venture | Fairfield, WA 99012 | $71,837 |
| 17 | Double F Ranch Inc | Rockford, WA 99030 | $70,988 |
| 18 | Rolling Hills Farms Inc | Spangle, WA 99031 | $70,109 |
| 19 | Hill View Farms Jv | Cheney, WA 99004 | $69,429 |
| 20 | Mac Bros Inc | Cheney, WA 99004 | $67,802 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf