Counter Cyclical Program in West Virginia, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,266
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in West Virginia totaled $3,540,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Elmwood Farm | Charles Town, WV 25414 | $80,118 |
| 2 | Dale Nibert Farms | Apple Grove, WV 25502 | $56,696 |
| 3 | Burns Farm | Charles Town, WV 25414 | $49,038 |
| 4 | Louis C Miltenberger | Keyser, WV 26726 | $47,757 |
| 5 | Stanley W Dunn Jr | Charles Town, WV 25414 | $43,446 |
| 6 | Lyle C Tabb & Sons Inc | Kearneysville, WV 25430 | $41,331 |
| 7 | Lovers Lane Farms | Moorefield, WV 26836 | $39,478 |
| 8 | Mallow Farms | Upper Tract, WV 26866 | $37,949 |
| 9 | Oakwood Farm LLC | Charles Town, WV 25414 | $34,505 |
| 10 | R Z Bane Inc | Summit Point, WV 25446 | $32,576 |
| 11 | W O Lloyd Farms LLC | Charles Town, WV 25414 | $30,676 |
| 12 | Nancy & Doug Stolipher And Mark S | Rippon, WV 25441 | $29,722 |
| 13 | Gruber Farms | Summit Point, WV 25446 | $29,208 |
| 14 | Riggs & Stiles Inc | Charles Town, WV 25414 | $28,146 |
| 15 | Avon Hill Farms Inc | Charles Town, WV 25414 | $27,954 |
| 16 | Hy-crest Farms LLC | Kearneysville, WV 25430 | $27,734 |
| 17 | Zigler Inc | Charles Town, WV 25414 | $27,359 |
| 18 | Triple D Farms Partnership | London, OH 43140 | $27,026 |
| 19 | William A Knighten | Shepherdstown, WV 25443 | $26,109 |
| 20 | Ours Valley View Poultry Farm Inc | Moorefield, WV 26836 | $25,947 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf