Loan Deficiency in West Virginia, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,720
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in West Virginia totaled $8,206,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Burns Farm | Charles Town, WV 25414 | $266,158 |
| 2 | Oakwood Farm LLC | Charles Town, WV 25414 | $192,637 |
| 3 | Riggs & Stiles Inc | Charles Town, WV 25414 | $177,653 |
| 4 | Lyle C Tabb & Sons Inc | Kearneysville, WV 25430 | $170,816 |
| 5 | Dale Nibert Farms | Apple Grove, WV 25502 | $159,956 |
| 6 | Drilake Farm Inc | Charles Town, WV 25414 | $156,648 |
| 7 | R Z Bane Inc | Summit Point, WV 25446 | $123,199 |
| 8 | Stanley W Dunn Jr | Charles Town, WV 25414 | $115,396 |
| 9 | Gruber Farms | Summit Point, WV 25446 | $114,943 |
| 10 | Linger Farms Inc | Huttonsville, WV 26273 | $114,446 |
| 11 | Mallow Farms | Upper Tract, WV 26866 | $99,608 |
| 12 | Lovers Lane Farms | Moorefield, WV 26836 | $99,124 |
| 13 | Louis C Miltenberger | Keyser, WV 26726 | $98,243 |
| 14 | Shady Grove Farm LLC | Rippon, WV 25441 | $97,537 |
| 15 | Dan W Folk | Hedgesville, WV 25427 | $87,277 |
| 16 | Zigler Inc | Charles Town, WV 25414 | $87,019 |
| 17 | Nancy & Doug Stolipher And Mark S | Rippon, WV 25441 | $85,452 |
| 18 | Green Mesa Farms | Henderson, WV 25106 | $76,881 |
| 19 | Ward Thomas & Sons Inc | Bruceton Mills, WV 26525 | $75,829 |
| 20 | Michael W Wolpert | Hurricane, WV 25526 | $74,232 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf