Margin Protection Program in West Virginia, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 52
Recipients of Margin Protection Program from farms in West Virginia totaled $9,229 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Margin Protection Program 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Riggs & Stiles Inc | Charles Town, WV 25414 | $605 |
| 2 | John O Hardesty & Son LLC | Berryville, VA 22611 | $572 |
| 3 | Oakwood Farm LLC | Charles Town, WV 25414 | $566 |
| 4 | Boggess Dairy Inc | Peterstown, WV 24963 | $512 |
| 5 | Remington W Perkins | Frankford, WV 24938 | $405 |
| 6 | Carl F Bachtel | Eglon, WV 26716 | $393 |
| 7 | Gruber Farms | Summit Point, WV 25446 | $391 |
| 8 | Linton Brothers Inc | Martinsburg, WV 25403 | $368 |
| 9 | Emory L Hanna | Renick, WV 24966 | $340 |
| 10 | Locust Grove Farm Inc | Kearneysville, WV 25430 | $333 |
| 11 | Paul E. Shockey - Bridgewater Farms | Ravenswood, WV 26164 | $312 |
| 12 | James T Blue & Sons Inc | Shenandoah Junction, WV 25442 | $307 |
| 13 | William Nicholas Snyder-shenstone Farm | Summit Point, WV 25446 | $236 |
| 14 | Ernest E Bachtel | Eglon, WV 26716 | $205 |
| 15 | Kenneth L Poling | Clarksburg, WV 26301 | $186 |
| 16 | Walnut Ridge Dairy Inc | Peterstown, WV 24963 | $185 |
| 17 | Roberta V Mong - Rolling Acres Farm | Martinsburg, WV 25404 | $178 |
| 18 | Gregory A Gibson | Bruceton Mills, WV 26525 | $173 |
| 19 | Jeffrey Walker - Locust Lane Farm | Union, WV 24983 | $161 |
| 20 | Belle Vue Dairy | Union, WV 24983 | $161 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf