Farm Subsidy information
Pendleton County, West Virginia
Total Subsidies in Pendleton County, West Virginia, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 859
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Pendleton County, West Virginia totaled $10,957,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Mallow Farms | Upper Tract, WV 26866 | $605,026 |
2 | Redbud Acres, LLC | Sugar Grove, WV 26815 | $250,000 |
3 | Adamson Farms Inc | Brandywine, WV 26802 | $234,946 |
4 | Harry S Conrad | Brandywine, WV 26802 | $225,102 |
5 | Conrad Farms Incorporated | Brandywine, WV 26802 | $223,996 |
6 | Hott's Farming Inc | Franklin, WV 26807 | $219,286 |
7 | John D Heavner | Upper Tract, WV 26866 | $194,161 |
8 | Heavner Farms LLC | Upper Tract, WV 26866 | $175,334 |
9 | Gregory A Dyer | Brandywine, WV 26802 | $145,927 |
10 | Long Run Poultry Inc | Franklin, WV 26807 | $143,020 |
11 | Stanley R Mallow | Upper Tract, WV 26866 | $127,310 |
12 | Brandywine Farm LLC | Harrisonburg, VA 22802 | $118,960 |
13 | Oak Flat Farm Inc | Dayton, VA 22821 | $117,012 |
14 | John W Mccoy | Franklin, WV 26807 | $106,494 |
15 | Shanon Pitsenbarger | Bridgeport, WV 26330 | $94,741 |
16 | Kenneth P Harper | Circleville, WV 26804 | $92,543 |
17 | Helen Heavner | Upper Tract, WV 26866 | $91,867 |
18 | Hotts Farming Inc | Ft Seybert, WV 26802 | $88,978 |
19 | Donald R Mitchell | Upper Tract, WV 26866 | $87,309 |
20 | F Ray Heavener | Circleville, WV 26804 | $87,100 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>