Farm Subsidy information
Wisconsin
Total Subsidies in Wisconsin, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 33,716
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Wisconsin totaled $577,162,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Steinacker Farms Inc | Hortonville, WI 54944 | $254,781 |
42 | Ralph C Berry | Curtiss, WI 54422 | $252,758 |
43 | Valley Mead Farm LLC | Monticello, WI 53570 | $251,177 |
44 | Verhasselt Farms Ltd | Kaukauna, WI 54130 | $250,948 |
45 | Danes Fairylane Dairy Farm Inc | New Holstein, WI 53061 | $248,091 |
46 | Denmark Dairy LLC | Colfax, WI 54730 | $246,674 |
47 | Wagner Dairy Operations LLC | Middleton, WI 53562 | $246,600 |
48 | Jacobs Brothers | De Pere, WI 54115 | $246,000 |
49 | Consolidated Mills Farms Inc | Kansasville, WI 53139 | $244,450 |
50 | J M Schmidt & Sons Inc | Theresa, WI 53091 | $240,489 |
51 | Statz Bros Inc | Marshall, WI 53559 | $239,238 |
52 | Siemers Holstein Farm Inc | Newton, WI 53063 | $238,530 |
53 | Brian Kazmierczak | Germantown, WI 53022 | $234,464 |
54 | Kevin Kazmierczak | Germantown, WI 53022 | $234,464 |
55 | Darlington Ridge Farms LLC | Darlington, WI 53530 | $234,339 |
56 | Cranberry Creek Cranberries Inc | Necedah, WI 54646 | $234,221 |
57 | Cross Farms LLC | Oshkosh, WI 54904 | $231,056 |
58 | Double S Dairy LLC | Markesan, WI 53946 | $229,848 |
59 | Mcmillan Farms Inc | Marshfield, WI 54449 | $229,840 |
60 | A-team | Bay City, WI 54723 | $229,540 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”