Conservation Reserve Program in Wisconsin, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 9,128
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Wisconsin totaled $30,195,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | High Valley Farms Inc | Cross Plains, WI 53528 | $100,000 |
2 | Charlene James | Darlington, WI 53530 | $72,472 |
3 | Ed James | Darlington, WI 53530 | $72,471 |
4 | Klaisland Farms | Stitzer, WI 53825 | $72,363 |
5 | Albert E Ryckman -albert E Ryckma | Albany, OR 97321 | $57,869 |
6 | Timothy Edward James | Greenville, WI 54942 | $56,336 |
7 | Steven M Thaler | Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 | $50,000 |
8 | Dorothy H Koeller | Potosi, WI 53820 | $50,000 |
9 | Iowa County Rec & Prairie Restoration Ltd | Mineral Point, WI 53565 | $50,000 |
10 | Greg J Oimoen | Blue Mounds, WI 53517 | $49,894 |
11 | Stracka Family Farm Trust | Verona, WI 53593 | $49,852 |
12 | Kevin K King | Mineral Point, WI 53565 | $49,783 |
13 | Fritz Investments Limited Partnership | Lancaster, WI 53813 | $49,500 |
14 | Kenneth Van Bogaert | Darlington, WI 53530 | $49,160 |
15 | Driftless Area Land Conservancy | Dodgeville, WI 53533 | $49,126 |
16 | Golden K Acres LLC | Shullsburg, WI 53586 | $48,400 |
17 | Scott J Wedig | Argyle, WI 53504 | $48,222 |
18 | Hardtland Holsteins Llp | Sun Prairie, WI 53590 | $47,982 |
19 | Brandt Lands Inc | Potosi, WI 53820 | $47,548 |
20 | T J G LLC | Hartland, WI 53029 | $46,724 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>