Margin Protection Program in Wisconsin, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 6,632
Recipients of Margin Protection Program from farms in Wisconsin totaled $68,816,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Margin Protection Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $1,137,493 |
2 | Pagel's Ponderosa Dairy LLC | Kewaunee, WI 54216 | $127,345 |
3 | Dairyland Farms LLC | New Franken, WI 54229 | $99,796 |
4 | Harold K Christensen Jr | Abbotsford, WI 54405 | $84,558 |
5 | Dairy Dreams LLC | Casco, WI 54205 | $81,501 |
6 | Patricia M Dufek | New Franken, WI 54229 | $54,124 |
7 | Legendairy Farms LLC | Wonewoc, WI 53968 | $52,956 |
8 | Baerwolf Dairies LLC | Sun Prairie, WI 53590 | $51,649 |
9 | Tkunkel Dairy Farms, LLC | Cuba City, WI 53807 | $51,281 |
10 | Jc-kow Farms LLC | Whitewater, WI 53190 | $48,289 |
11 | Waddell Farms LLC | Marshall, WI 53559 | $47,695 |
12 | Brian W Horn | Brillion, WI 54110 | $47,464 |
13 | Gordondale Farms Inc | Nelsonville, WI 54458 | $47,137 |
14 | Neldell Farms LLC | Wisconsin Dells, WI 53965 | $46,164 |
15 | Leon F Lienke | Beaver Dam, WI 53916 | $44,242 |
16 | Ronald Roskopf | Hartford, WI 53027 | $42,962 |
17 | Phil Robertson Farms LLC | Pulaski, WI 54162 | $42,505 |
18 | Emerald Acres | De Pere, WI 54115 | $42,259 |
19 | Ds Farms LLC | Alma, WI 54610 | $42,240 |
20 | Grass Ridge Farm LLC | Pittsville, WI 54466 | $42,107 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>