Production Flexibility Program in Wisconsin, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 60,348
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Wisconsin totaled $777,008,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Metcalf Farms | Janesville, WI 53546 | $1,118,785 |
2 | Dane County Growers Ptrn | Edgerton, WI 53534 | $908,282 |
3 | Hartung Farms | Madison, WI 53717 | $833,410 |
4 | John E Walsh And Sons | Mauston, WI 53948 | $749,285 |
5 | Rossi Grain Farms | Bristol, WI 53104 | $747,597 |
6 | Kippley Farms | Waunakee, WI 53597 | $713,728 |
7 | Weeks Farms | Harvard, IL 60033 | $688,200 |
8 | Roger Rebout & Sons Farm | Janesville, WI 53548 | $619,256 |
9 | Riley Brothers | Mauston, WI 53948 | $599,304 |
10 | Gorton Farms | Racine, WI 53406 | $591,797 |
11 | Twin City Farms | Beloit, WI 53511 | $582,824 |
12 | Wilks Brothers | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $576,372 |
13 | Bolton Farms | Burlington, WI 53105 | $559,744 |
14 | Blue Star Dairy Farms Partnership | De Forest, WI 53532 | $511,154 |
15 | Gunderson Grain Farms | Waterford, WI 53185 | $510,104 |
16 | Noble Grain Farms | Burlington, WI 53105 | $509,952 |
17 | Oneida Nation | Seymour, WI 54165 | $508,282 |
18 | Keske And Keske | Brocton, IL 61917 | $486,238 |
19 | Riesterer Farms Llp | Milton, WI 53563 | $484,697 |
20 | Charles Kuiper & Son | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $461,886 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>