Total Conservation Programs in Wisconsin, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 8,636
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Wisconsin totaled $30,492,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Leahy Grain Inc | Cuba City, WI 53807 | $102,831 |
| 2 | 9140 Hanson Family Farm LLC | Argyle, WI 53504 | $88,468 |
| 3 | Klaisland Farms | Stitzer, WI 53825 | $80,012 |
| 4 | Benton State Bank ** | Benton, WI 53803 | $63,746 |
| 5 | Bernice Flogel | Mineral Point, WI 53565 | $61,978 |
| 6 | Steven W Gorton - Steven W And Debra J Gorton Trus | Monroe, WI 53566 | $59,154 |
| 7 | Bret C Van Bogaert | Mineral Point, WI 53565 | $51,734 |
| 8 | High Valley Farms Inc | Cross Plains, WI 53528 | $50,000 |
| 9 | Steven M Thaler | Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 | $50,000 |
| 10 | The Prairie Enthusiasts Inc | Verona, WI 53593 | $50,000 |
| 11 | David Chambers | Darlington, WI 53530 | $50,000 |
| 12 | Iowa County Rec & Prairie Restoration Ltd | Mineral Point, WI 53565 | $50,000 |
| 13 | Driftless Area Land Conservancy | Dodgeville, WI 53533 | $50,000 |
| 14 | Charlene James | Darlington, WI 53530 | $49,986 |
| 15 | Edward James | Darlington, WI 53530 | $49,986 |
| 16 | Darlington Farms Inc | Darlington, WI 53530 | $49,899 |
| 17 | Greg J Oimoen | Blue Mounds, WI 53517 | $49,894 |
| 18 | Larry L Steffes | Mineral Point, WI 53565 | $49,876 |
| 19 | Stracka Family Farm Trust | Mineral Point, WI 53565 | $49,852 |
| 20 | Kevin K King | Mineral Point, WI 53565 | $49,783 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf