Farm Subsidy information
Chippewa County, Wisconsin
Total Subsidies in Chippewa County, Wisconsin, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 831
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Chippewa County, Wisconsin totaled $30,943,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Mahr Brothers LLC | Stanley, WI 54768 | $1,599,051 |
2 | Arrowhead Farms Partnership | Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 | $776,981 |
3 | Solhawk Dairy Inc | Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 | $723,452 |
4 | Five Star Dairy LLC | Elk Mound, WI 54739 | $675,727 |
5 | Kenealy Dairy Farms | Cadott, WI 54727 | $604,211 |
6 | Gilbertson Farms Inc | Elk Mound, WI 54739 | $580,219 |
7 | Udder Wise Dairy LLC | Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 | $544,449 |
8 | North Road Dairy LLC | Colfax, WI 54730 | $493,600 |
9 | Close Harvesting LLC | Cadott, WI 54727 | $475,424 |
10 | Keith S Dachel | Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 | $436,981 |
11 | Solberg Dairy Inc | Elk Mound, WI 54739 | $436,143 |
12 | Hilger Farms Inc | Bloomer, WI 54724 | $431,683 |
13 | Douglas T Danielson | Cadott, WI 54727 | $400,244 |
14 | Triple T Farms LLC | Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 | $391,684 |
15 | Lagesse Dairy Farms Inc | Bloomer, WI 54724 | $362,633 |
16 | William Overgard | Stanley, WI 54768 | $338,240 |
17 | Dribble Ridge Dairy | Colfax, WI 54730 | $319,668 |
18 | Custer Farms Inc | Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 | $312,052 |
19 | Lnb Farms LLC | Bloomer, WI 54724 | $300,105 |
20 | Backhaus Acres LLC | Boyd, WI 54726 | $284,176 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>