Market Loss Assistance Program in Chippewa County, Wisconsin, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,763
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Chippewa County, Wisconsin totaled $13,773,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | David R Faschingbauer | Bloomer, WI 54724 | $162,612 |
2 | Hilger Farms Inc | Bloomer, WI 54724 | $139,849 |
3 | Custer Farms Inc | Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 | $134,543 |
4 | Larry Sahm | Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 | $128,102 |
5 | Steven D Wall | Bloomer, WI 54724 | $116,641 |
6 | Harrison Farms Inc | Elk Mound, WI 54739 | $98,806 |
7 | H & H Farms | Bloomer, WI 54724 | $85,335 |
8 | Valley Beau Farms | Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 | $85,017 |
9 | Peck Valley Dairy Inc | Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 | $80,345 |
10 | Gilbertson Farms Inc | Elk Mound, WI 54739 | $75,054 |
11 | Solberg Farms LLC | Elk Mound, WI 54739 | $64,534 |
12 | Sandy Acres Dairy | Elk Mound, WI 54739 | $62,440 |
13 | Stephen E Williams | Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 | $62,092 |
14 | Suvada Brothers | Colfax, WI 54730 | $56,088 |
15 | Cooks Valley Dairy Farm Ltd | Holcombe, WI 54745 | $54,533 |
16 | Leduc & Leduc | Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 | $54,314 |
17 | Five Star Dairy LLC | Elk Mound, WI 54739 | $53,253 |
18 | Eder Brothers | Colfax, WI 54730 | $52,982 |
19 | Steinmetz Farms, LLC | Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 | $52,590 |
20 | Ander & Son Dairy Farm | Elk Mound, WI 54739 | $52,316 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>