Dairy Programs in Dane County, Wisconsin, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 144
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in Dane County, Wisconsin totaled $2,273,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $187,412 |
| 2 | Stanley Rauls | De Forest, WI 53532 | $44,386 |
| 3 | Langer Dairy Farms LLC | Deforest, WI 53532 | $36,134 |
| 4 | Helt Diversified LLC | Waunakee, WI 53597 | $31,563 |
| 5 | Sweetwater Farms Inc | Dane, WI 53529 | $31,563 |
| 6 | Ripp's Wauna-dairy Inc | Waunakee, WI 53597 | $31,563 |
| 7 | White Gold Dairy LLC | Waunakee, WI 53597 | $31,563 |
| 8 | Wipperfurth Dairy LLC | Dane, WI 53529 | $31,563 |
| 9 | Sunburst Dairy Inc | Belleville, WI 53508 | $31,563 |
| 10 | Fertile Ridge Dairy LLC | Mount Horeb, WI 53572 | $31,563 |
| 11 | O'connell Farms LLC | Blue Mounds, WI 53517 | $31,563 |
| 12 | Endres Berryridge Farms LLC | Waunakee, WI 53597 | $31,563 |
| 13 | Ripp's Dairy Valley LLC | Dane, WI 53529 | $31,563 |
| 14 | Maple Vane Dairy Inc | Waunakee, WI 53597 | $31,563 |
| 15 | Bryan Rauls | Deforest, WI 53532 | $31,563 |
| 16 | Roger S Manthe | Deforest, WI 53532 | $31,563 |
| 17 | Mystic Valley Dairy LLC | Sauk City, WI 53583 | $31,563 |
| 18 | Hensen Bros Dairy Inc | Waunakee, WI 53597 | $31,563 |
| 19 | Virgil A Ripp | Dane, WI 53529 | $31,563 |
| 20 | Mulcahy Farms LLC | Dane, WI 53529 | $31,563 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf