Farm Subsidy information
Eau Claire County, Wisconsin
Total Subsidies in Eau Claire County, Wisconsin, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 688
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Eau Claire County, Wisconsin totaled $11,859,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Seguin's Valley View Acres LLC | Eleva, WI 54738 | $693,215 |
| 2 | Kurt Schulz | Augusta, WI 54722 | $359,460 |
| 3 | Bears Grass Dairy Inc | Augusta, WI 54722 | $331,980 |
| 4 | Charles Huth | Boyd, WI 54726 | $323,426 |
| 5 | Larson Dairy Inc | Eleva, WI 54738 | $208,534 |
| 6 | Zimmerman Farms | Osseo, WI 54758 | $190,728 |
| 7 | Dale Randall & Sons Inc | Augusta, WI 54722 | $176,190 |
| 8 | Walker Bros Farm Dba Skyglo Farms | Augusta, WI 54722 | $163,406 |
| 9 | Adams Dairy Inc | Eleva, WI 54738 | $161,179 |
| 10 | Donald Pieper | Fall Creek, WI 54742 | $156,109 |
| 11 | Timothy Stanton | Mondovi, WI 54755 | $127,838 |
| 12 | Scott E Randall | Augusta, WI 54722 | $127,267 |
| 13 | Scott Geske Dba Geske Farms | Fall Creek, WI 54742 | $125,967 |
| 14 | Patrick Schaffer | Eau Claire, WI 54701 | $124,211 |
| 15 | Matthew Fendry | Strum, WI 54770 | $123,416 |
| 16 | Paul W Rauch | Fall Creek, WI 54742 | $122,648 |
| 17 | Sarah Schaffer | Eau Claire, WI 54701 | $121,714 |
| 18 | Wilbert Schaffer | Cannon Falls, MN 55009 | $121,608 |
| 19 | Carol Schaffer | Eau Claire, WI 54701 | $121,608 |
| 20 | Douglas L Nelson | Eau Claire, WI 54701 | $120,482 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf