Total Disaster Programs in Green Lake County, Wisconsin, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 203
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Green Lake County, Wisconsin totaled $2,614,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Eisenga Farms Inc | Markesan, WI 53946 | $158,690 |
| 2 | James A Hebbe | Green Lake, WI 54941 | $138,904 |
| 3 | Dhn Farms Partnership | Markesan, WI 53946 | $114,882 |
| 4 | Walter Alan Affeldt | Markesan, WI 53946 | $106,561 |
| 5 | Pride View Dairy LLC | Randolph, WI 53956 | $65,616 |
| 6 | David E Kohn | Markesan, WI 53946 | $65,367 |
| 7 | Eagen Farms | Berlin, WI 54923 | $64,381 |
| 8 | Jerry Eisenga | Randolph, WI 53956 | $62,054 |
| 9 | John E Bauer | Berlin, WI 54923 | $58,344 |
| 10 | J & P Kearns Brothers | Dalton, WI 53926 | $55,692 |
| 11 | David A Affeldt | Markesan, WI 53946 | $51,717 |
| 12 | Richard A Mace | Markesan, WI 53946 | $50,173 |
| 13 | Kenneth D Wolter | Green Lake, WI 54941 | $49,655 |
| 14 | Timothy And Thomas Graff | Markesan, WI 53946 | $45,826 |
| 15 | John Laper Homestead Inc | Markesan, WI 53946 | $43,511 |
| 16 | Richard S Swanke | Princeton, WI 54968 | $41,923 |
| 17 | Carlton Schley | Fox Lake, WI 53933 | $37,324 |
| 18 | Russell F Denson | Dalton, WI 53926 | $33,769 |
| 19 | Schurecrest Farms Inc | Markesan, WI 53946 | $33,573 |
| 20 | Bahn Farms Inc | Ripon, WI 54971 | $32,424 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf