SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program in Jefferson County, Wisconsin, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 125
Recipients of SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program from farms in Jefferson County, Wisconsin totaled $3,696,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | B And O Farms | Rio, WI 53960 | $243,846 |
2 | David G Schroeder | Cambridge, WI 53523 | $100,000 |
3 | Lewellyn Beilke | Jefferson, WI 53549 | $100,000 |
4 | Dean Kincaid Inc | Palmyra, WI 53156 | $100,000 |
5 | Keller's Turf Farms Ltd | Sullivan, WI 53178 | $100,000 |
6 | Darren W Schroeder | Columbus, WI 53925 | $100,000 |
7 | Diana L Schroeder | Cambridge, WI 53523 | $100,000 |
8 | Kieck Farms LLC | Ixonia, WI 53036 | $100,000 |
9 | John Edward Storck | Fort Atkinson, WI 53538 | $99,484 |
10 | David A Hughes | Wisconsin Rapids, WI 54495 | $98,387 |
11 | David G Christian | Watertown, WI 53094 | $93,692 |
12 | Anthony Schadt | Watertown, WI 53094 | $90,864 |
13 | Charles Schadt | Watertown, WI 53094 | $90,864 |
14 | Stephen - Duwe Farms L Duwe | Johnson Creek, WI 53038 | $87,218 |
15 | Steven J Knoebel | Helenville, WI 53137 | $85,006 |
16 | Larry E Storck | Fort Atkinson, WI 53538 | $84,458 |
17 | Steven M Homann | Lake Mills, WI 53551 | $79,695 |
18 | Franz A Weigand | Fort Atkinson, WI 53538 | $71,240 |
19 | Theodore G Reeb | Whitewater, WI 53190 | $69,286 |
20 | Bruce J Ehlers | Fort Atkinson, WI 53538 | $61,842 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>