Farm Subsidy information
Juneau County, Wisconsin
Total Subsidies in Juneau County, Wisconsin, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,741
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Juneau County, Wisconsin totaled $129,510,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Dale Schultz | New Lisbon, WI 53950 | $738,567 |
22 | James A Hall | Lyndon Station, WI 53944 | $731,260 |
23 | Patrick Mitchell | Lyndon Station, WI 53944 | $694,347 |
24 | Gary Barreau | Mauston, WI 53948 | $672,245 |
25 | Blue Wind Farms Inc | Camp Douglas, WI 54618 | $661,739 |
26 | Guy D Smith | Mauston, WI 53948 | $638,097 |
27 | Woggon Farms LLC | Camp Douglas, WI 54618 | $631,649 |
28 | Jdh Cranberries LLC | Necedah, WI 54646 | $613,222 |
29 | Robert Stange | New Lisbon, WI 53950 | $599,209 |
30 | Leo Moravek | New Lisbon, WI 53950 | $588,068 |
31 | Tirawley Acres LLC | Camp Douglas, WI 54618 | $557,780 |
32 | Mcgowan Century Farms LLC | Lyndon Station, WI 53944 | $557,120 |
33 | Samuel I Bell | Tomah, WI 54660 | $535,108 |
34 | Cranberry Creek Cranberries Inc | Necedah, WI 54646 | $515,535 |
35 | Robert A Holig | Mauston, WI 53948 | $499,614 |
36 | Harold H Babcock | Mauston, WI 53948 | $498,939 |
37 | Blanke & Daly Farms | Wisconsin Rapids, WI 54494 | $489,662 |
38 | Alan S Ruf | Mauston, WI 53948 | $442,310 |
39 | Jerry R Gibbons | Camp Douglas, WI 54618 | $395,145 |
40 | Stephen D Powers | Mauston, WI 53948 | $391,553 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”