Market Loss Assistance Program in Kenosha County, Wisconsin, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 277
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Kenosha County, Wisconsin totaled $5,362,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rossi Grain Farms | Bristol, WI 53104 | $390,602 |
| 2 | Jay R Sorensen | Pleasant Prairie, WI 53158 | $139,888 |
| 3 | Hawkins Farms Inc | Bristol, WI 53104 | $139,809 |
| 4 | Elmer Weis | Kenosha, WI 53142 | $136,984 |
| 5 | Reynolds Farm Partnership | Genoa City, WI 53128 | $133,837 |
| 6 | J Boilini Farms Inc | Lake Geneva, WI 53147 | $126,412 |
| 7 | Thelen Sand & Gravel | Twin Lakes, WI 53181 | $107,657 |
| 8 | William Walker | Bristol, WI 53104 | $107,646 |
| 9 | Charles Tunkieicz Farm Inc | Kenosha, WI 53144 | $97,327 |
| 10 | Gitzlaff Farms Inc | Kenosha, WI 53144 | $92,626 |
| 11 | Bart Ament | Kansasville, WI 53139 | $92,131 |
| 12 | Brent Nelson | Kenosha, WI 53142 | $91,105 |
| 13 | Mighty Grand Dairy LLC | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $86,699 |
| 14 | Mark K Edquist | Kenosha, WI 53144 | $83,823 |
| 15 | Daniels Dairy II | Kansasville, WI 53139 | $74,720 |
| 16 | Lois Bros | Burlington, WI 53105 | $74,458 |
| 17 | John P Steinbrink | Pleasant Prairie, WI 53158 | $67,612 |
| 18 | Robert F Fliess Jr | Kenosha, WI 53144 | $66,761 |
| 19 | Gary Nelson Farms Inc | Kenosha, WI 53142 | $64,550 |
| 20 | James Rogers | Bristol, WI 53104 | $63,111 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf