Total Commodity Programs in La Crosse County, Wisconsin, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,383
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in La Crosse County, Wisconsin totaled $63,455,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Steven Miller | La Crosse, WI 54601 | $312,686 |
42 | Hollow Twin Farms | West Salem, WI 54669 | $311,511 |
43 | Karl Rhyme | West Salem, WI 54669 | $304,240 |
44 | Donald Hammes | Coon Valley, WI 54623 | $299,416 |
45 | Octagon Farms Of Barre Mills LLC | La Crosse, WI 54601 | $297,491 |
46 | James A Michelson | West Salem, WI 54669 | $296,801 |
47 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $294,286 |
48 | Timothy Goodenough | Mindoro, WI 54644 | $287,455 |
49 | Vanderzee Farms | Bangor, WI 54614 | $281,596 |
50 | Greg Jenniges | Mindoro, WI 54644 | $276,960 |
51 | Christine Schwier | West Salem, WI 54669 | $272,406 |
52 | James Kroener | Bangor, WI 54614 | $271,981 |
53 | Ted Dovenberg | Bangor, WI 54614 | $271,742 |
54 | Debra Ruth Rhyme | West Salem, WI 54669 | $270,591 |
55 | Jerry Kramer | La Crosse, WI 54601 | $270,555 |
56 | Todd C Trocinski | Holmen, WI 54636 | $268,125 |
57 | Ronald R Hanson | Mindoro, WI 54644 | $263,266 |
58 | Darin Berg | Coon Valley, WI 54623 | $261,755 |
59 | Big Sky Cattle LLC | West Salem, WI 54669 | $260,780 |
60 | James Kotek | West Salem, WI 54669 | $260,716 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”