Farm Subsidy information
Ozaukee County, Wisconsin
Total Subsidies in Ozaukee County, Wisconsin, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 858
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Ozaukee County, Wisconsin totaled $59,372,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Gary Bichler | Belgium, WI 53004 | $485,641 |
22 | Mark Hilgendorf | Mequon, WI 53097 | $466,547 |
23 | Decker Bros | Belgium, WI 53004 | $459,313 |
24 | Neal C Maciejewski | Grafton, WI 53024 | $458,375 |
25 | Hilgendorf Farm LLC | Mequon, WI 53097 | $442,276 |
26 | Richard E Lanser | Belgium, WI 53004 | $432,410 |
27 | Gary R Dieringer | Belgium, WI 53004 | $403,039 |
28 | Keith W Schueller | Belgium, WI 53004 | $399,559 |
29 | Gasser Farms LLC | Belgium, WI 53004 | $396,725 |
30 | Daniel Stemper | Fredonia, WI 53021 | $384,986 |
31 | Jacque Dairy Farm LLC | Port Washington, WI 53074 | $383,502 |
32 | Roger Karrels | Port Washington, WI 53074 | $375,605 |
33 | Dean E Arendt | Port Washington, WI 53074 | $371,194 |
34 | Opitz Farms | Saukville, WI 53080 | $359,091 |
35 | Kolbach Farms LLC | Port Washington, WI 53074 | $347,769 |
36 | Gerald Gantner | Belgium, WI 53004 | $342,658 |
37 | Dhpf Cattle LLC | Belgium, WI 53004 | $312,389 |
38 | Leider Farms Inc | Belgium, WI 53004 | $307,587 |
39 | Darwin O Kison | Cedarburg, WI 53012 | $298,636 |
40 | Peter Weiss | Belgium, WI 53004 | $291,035 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”