Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in Racine County, Wisconsin, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 103
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in Racine County, Wisconsin totaled $198,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Paul Frost | Waterford, WI 53185 | $25,731 |
2 | Himebauch Farms Llp | East Troy, WI 53120 | $5,837 |
3 | W James Schmidt | Waterford, WI 53185 | $5,598 |
4 | Wilks Brothers | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $5,103 |
5 | Lone Chestnut Farms | Burlington, WI 53105 | $5,067 |
6 | Warren Dairy Farm | Burlington, WI 53105 | $4,932 |
7 | Schaal Dairy Farm Llp | Burlington, WI 53105 | $4,883 |
8 | Richard Scott | Franksville, WI 53126 | $4,536 |
9 | Mark J Wilson | Burlington, WI 53105 | $4,230 |
10 | Merten Family Farm Inc | Horicon, WI 53032 | $4,064 |
11 | Vos Brothers | Burlington, WI 53105 | $3,780 |
12 | Elderbrook Farms | Burlington, WI 53105 | $3,731 |
13 | Marvin E Saltzmann | Waterford, WI 53185 | $3,708 |
14 | Malchine Farms Inc | Waterford, WI 53185 | $3,668 |
15 | John Beere | Waterford, WI 53185 | $3,596 |
16 | Greenmonte Farms Inc | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $3,389 |
17 | Paul H Leach | Kansasville, WI 53139 | $3,308 |
18 | Gary Ranke | Waterford, WI 53185 | $3,195 |
19 | John C Karczewski | Waterford, WI 53185 | $3,096 |
20 | Lauber Farm | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $3,074 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>