Total Disaster Programs in Washakie County, Wyoming, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 326
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Washakie County, Wyoming totaled $11,367,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lyman Ranch Co | Ten Sleep, WY 82442 | $540,087 |
| 2 | Carter Livestock Inc | Ten Sleep, WY 82442 | $469,103 |
| 3 | Gooseberry Creek Ranch LLC | Worland, WY 82401 | $442,003 |
| 4 | Galloway Ranch LLC | Ten Sleep, WY 82442 | $381,461 |
| 5 | Hampton Sheep Co Inc | Ten Sleep, WY 82442 | $337,072 |
| 6 | Rice Ranch Inc | Ten Sleep, WY 82442 | $289,023 |
| 7 | Kent Lewton | Ten Sleep, WY 82442 | $273,622 |
| 8 | Anderson Ranch Co | Ten Sleep, WY 82442 | $261,023 |
| 9 | Bryant Honey Inc | Worland, WY 82401 | $256,078 |
| 10 | Dale Lyman Ranch Inc | Ten Sleep, WY 82442 | $245,494 |
| 11 | Redland Angus | Manderson, WY 82432 | $241,208 |
| 12 | Greet Ranch Inc | Ten Sleep, WY 82442 | $238,423 |
| 13 | Rolly Redland | Ten Sleep, WY 82442 | $205,665 |
| 14 | Griemsman Livestock LLC | Worland, WY 82401 | $188,570 |
| 15 | Orchard Ranch, LLC | Ten Sleep, WY 82442 | $182,487 |
| 16 | Double H Ranch | Ten Sleep, WY 82442 | $180,079 |
| 17 | Crowfoot Ranch Inc | Worland, WY 82401 | $178,324 |
| 18 | Brubaker Sheep Co LLC | Ten Sleep, WY 82442 | $176,788 |
| 19 | Broken Back Ranch Co Inc | Ten Sleep, WY 82442 | $166,702 |
| 20 | Starbuck Ranch LLC | Ten Sleep, WY 82442 | $164,305 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf