Conservation Reserve Program in Puerto Rico, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 24
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Puerto Rico totaled $824,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Edwin Soto Santiago | Las Marias, PR 00670 | $222,000 |
| 2 | Hacienda Cafetalera Rio Prieto Sa Inc | San Juan, PR 00936 | $100,254 |
| 3 | Finca La Rubia Inc | Guayanilla, PR 00656 | $84,000 |
| 4 | Maria E Emanuelli-fernandez | Guaynabo, PR 00969 | $77,075 |
| 5 | Luz Esther Nieves Tirado | Corozal, PR 00783 | $63,016 |
| 6 | Jose R Ruiz Medina | Las Marias, PR 00670 | $54,000 |
| 7 | Americo Rodriguez Caraballo | Maricao, PR 00606 | $48,000 |
| 8 | Jose L Rios Rivera | Las Marias, PR 00670 | $45,600 |
| 9 | Anibal Rivera Luna | Naranjito, PR 00719 | $36,009 |
| 10 | Alfredo Ramirez Moragon | Guaynabo, PR 00969 | $16,022 |
| 11 | Finca Vicenta, Inc. | Adjuntas, PR 00601 | $14,400 |
| 12 | Maria Enid Morales Santiago | Naranjito, PR 00719 | $10,011 |
| 13 | Ismael Ramos Vargas | San German, PR 00683 | $9,789 |
| 14 | Jose F Rodriguez Rivera | San Juan, PR 00926 | $8,403 |
| 15 | Jose A Colon Irizarry | Jayuya, PR 00664 | $7,600 |
| 16 | Evangelista Ruiz Garcia | Guayama, PR 00784 | $6,300 |
| 17 | Moises Velez Santiago | Angeles, PR 00611 | $6,000 |
| 18 | Oscar F Ramos Rullan | Angeles, PR 00611 | $5,177 |
| 19 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $4,560 |
| 20 | Carlos Mercado Feliciano | Lares, PR 00669 | $2,167 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf