Farm Subsidy information
1st District of Alabama
(Rep. Bradley Byrne)
Total Subsidies in 1st District of Alabama (Rep. Bradley Byrne), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 3,487
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 1st District of Alabama (Rep. Bradley Byrne) totaled $224,877,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Seward Farms | Lucedale, MS 39452 | $1,960,772 |
| 22 | Salac Family Limited Partnership | Robertsdale, AL 36567 | $1,840,518 |
| 23 | Fairhope Dairy | Point Clear, AL 36564 | $1,833,911 |
| 24 | David E Bitto Dba Bitto Farms | Elberta, AL 36530 | $1,780,109 |
| 25 | Julio Corte III Farms | Daphne, AL 36526 | $1,735,335 |
| 26 | Walter R Richardson | Leroy, AL 36548 | $1,712,585 |
| 27 | John L Frank Jr | Elberta, AL 36530 | $1,700,330 |
| 28 | Fairhope Cotton Co | Fairhope, AL 36532 | $1,638,093 |
| 29 | Riebeling Farms Inc | Foley, AL 36535 | $1,620,546 |
| 30 | 4 M Family Farms | Saint Elmo, AL 36568 | $1,610,491 |
| 31 | Alabama 1031 Property Exchange In | Mobile, AL 36606 | $1,607,370 |
| 32 | Mullek Farms | Robertsdale, AL 36567 | $1,554,338 |
| 33 | Warden Farms | Grand Bay, AL 36541 | $1,511,204 |
| 34 | Thornburg Farms | Wilmer, AL 36587 | $1,375,518 |
| 35 | Kaiser Farms Inc | Elberta, AL 36530 | $1,340,633 |
| 36 | Julio Corte Farms | Daphne, AL 36526 | $1,311,980 |
| 37 | Jgj Farms Inc | Daphne, AL 36526 | $1,259,312 |
| 38 | Hilbert Eric Hall | Bay Minette, AL 36507 | $1,243,909 |
| 39 | Robert Lee Parker | Perdido, AL 36562 | $1,226,462 |
| 40 | Cleverdon Farms Inc | Foley, AL 36535 | $1,163,828 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf