Farm Subsidy information
4th District of Alabama
(Rep. Robert Aderholt)
Total Subsidies in 4th District of Alabama (Rep. Robert Aderholt), 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,327
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 4th District of Alabama (Rep. Robert Aderholt) totaled $12,789,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Isbell Farms | Muscle Shoals, AL 35662 | $752,276 |
| 2 | Spruell Farms | Mount Hope, AL 35651 | $461,567 |
| 3 | Counts Farms | Muscle Shoals, AL 35661 | $419,652 |
| 4 | Countsland Farms | Tuscumbia, AL 35674 | $305,705 |
| 5 | Bottomland Farms LLC | Hamilton, AL 35570 | $295,792 |
| 6 | Hillard Johnson & Sons | Leighton, AL 35646 | $271,760 |
| 7 | Fennel Farms | Leighton, AL 35646 | $245,099 |
| 8 | Zakariah Keith Mccorkle | Tuscumbia, AL 35674 | $199,750 |
| 9 | Paul Jeffreys Farm | Leighton, AL 35646 | $198,138 |
| 10 | Minor Farms | Muscle Shoals, AL 35661 | $186,702 |
| 11 | William Tony Gargis Sr Dba Tony Gargis Farms | Leighton, AL 35646 | $185,052 |
| 12 | Coty Bullington | Muscle Shoals, AL 35661 | $178,412 |
| 13 | Matthew B Campbell | Phil Campbell, AL 35581 | $172,142 |
| 14 | B Miller Farms LLC | Hamilton, AL 35570 | $168,000 |
| 15 | Letson Brothers Farms | Hillsboro, AL 35643 | $161,349 |
| 16 | William Tony Gargis Jr | Leighton, AL 35646 | $153,595 |
| 17 | Harvey F Robbins III | Tuscumbia, AL 35674 | $152,480 |
| 18 | Candice Bullington | Muscle Shoals, AL 35661 | $151,857 |
| 19 | Pullen Farms | Town Creek, AL 35672 | $138,676 |
| 20 | Ronald Neal Wright | Leighton, AL 35646 | $133,946 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf