Farm Subsidy information
7th District of Alabama
(Rep. Terri Sewell)
Total Subsidies in 7th District of Alabama (Rep. Terri Sewell), 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,196
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 7th District of Alabama (Rep. Terri Sewell) totaled $18,806,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brandon Jones | Gallion, AL 36742 | $503,148 |
| 2 | Etheridge Farms | Thomaston, AL 36783 | $396,256 |
| 3 | Drury Catfish Farms Inc | Greensboro, AL 36744 | $354,547 |
| 4 | Anna B Mckibbens | Tuscaloosa, AL 35402 | $349,972 |
| 5 | Walters Farming Company | Gallion, AL 36742 | $338,399 |
| 6 | Double Wheel Ranch LLC | Boligee, AL 35443 | $335,694 |
| 7 | Richy Naisbett | Demopolis, AL 36732 | $303,198 |
| 8 | Lawson Catfish Farms Inc | Greensboro, AL 36744 | $279,401 |
| 9 | Beeker Catfish & Cattle Farm Inc | Eutaw, AL 35462 | $276,531 |
| 10 | Penala Farms, Lllp | Epes, AL 35460 | $267,449 |
| 11 | Smelley Farms LLC | Greensboro, AL 36744 | $264,264 |
| 12 | Luther Allen Dial | Emelle, AL 35459 | $259,309 |
| 13 | Jeffery S Weeks | Greensboro, AL 36744 | $256,246 |
| 14 | L & G Operations Inc | Greensboro, AL 36744 | $255,119 |
| 15 | Partlow Catfish LLC | Tuscaloosa, AL 35404 | $245,709 |
| 16 | B & J Catfish Farm Inc | Newbern, AL 36765 | $223,222 |
| 17 | Double K Farm LLC | Greensboro, AL 36744 | $219,224 |
| 18 | Michael E Larkin | Livingston, AL 35470 | $214,408 |
| 19 | Pineview Farms Inc | Greensboro, AL 36744 | $204,313 |
| 20 | Wtkii LLC | Greensboro, AL 36744 | $199,340 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf