Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in 1st District of California (Rep. Doug LaMalfa), 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 184
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in 1st District of California (Rep. Doug LaMalfa) totaled $1,318,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Tally Ho Farms Partnership Dba Walker Brothers | Merrill, OR 97633 | $140,080 |
2 | J T Farms | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $66,162 |
3 | Swaran S Sidhu Dba Sidhu Farms | Fairfield, CA 94533 | $65,608 |
4 | Robert R Bignami | Orland, CA 95963 | $44,301 |
5 | Dutro Farms Inc | Chico, CA 95973 | $43,810 |
6 | Chambers Joint Venture | Artois, CA 95913 | $33,014 |
7 | Jay S Dow Jr | Wendel, CA 96136 | $31,298 |
8 | Roberti Ranch | Loyalton, CA 96118 | $30,354 |
9 | Huffman & Son Hay, Inc. | Tulelake, CA 96134 | $25,735 |
10 | Ramiro Ferreira | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $24,811 |
11 | Clinton Hall | Tulelake, CA 96134 | $23,077 |
12 | John Anderson Farms Inc | Tulelake, CA 96134 | $21,995 |
13 | Seus Family Farms Inc | Tulelake, CA 96134 | $21,305 |
14 | M D Huffman Farms Inc | Tulelake, CA 96134 | $21,234 |
15 | J A Conner 2001 Living Trust | Adin, CA 96006 | $20,996 |
16 | Lyman Farms LLC | Tulelake, CA 96134 | $19,559 |
17 | David King | Malin, OR 97632 | $17,546 |
18 | George Farms Inc | Bieber, CA 96009 | $16,139 |
19 | Russell Harman | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $15,661 |
20 | Brandt Orchards | Los Molinos, CA 96055 | $14,947 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>