Total Commodity Programs in 1st District of California (Rep. Doug LaMalfa), 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 781
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 1st District of California (Rep. Doug LaMalfa) totaled $43,939,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | M D Huffman Farms Inc | Tulelake, CA 96134 | $370,134 |
22 | Holiday Ranches Inc | Cottonwood, CA 96022 | $369,787 |
23 | Long & Long Orchards Inc | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $369,659 |
24 | Panhandle West, Inc | Malin, OR 97632 | $363,750 |
25 | Dutro Farms Inc | Chico, CA 95973 | $362,808 |
26 | Pamela R Bignami | Orland, CA 95963 | $342,037 |
27 | Daniel A Sutfin | Corning, CA 96021 | $337,767 |
28 | Tehama Angus Ranch Inc | Gerber, CA 96035 | $337,488 |
29 | Richard Anklin | Canby, CA 96015 | $331,734 |
30 | Rodney R Flournoy | Likely, CA 96116 | $330,597 |
31 | Rumiano Farms | Vina, CA 96092 | $323,154 |
32 | Robert A Byrne Co | Malin, OR 97632 | $321,504 |
33 | Maywood Farms | Corning, CA 96021 | $319,009 |
34 | Mt Lassen Trout Farms Inc | Paynes Creek, CA 96075 | $312,469 |
35 | Robert Camozzi II | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $308,624 |
36 | Lazy Spade LLC | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $290,367 |
37 | Matt Anchordoguy Company LLC | Vina, CA 96092 | $273,474 |
38 | Lindauer River Ranch Inc | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $272,518 |
39 | Doyle Ranch Inc | Corning, CA 96021 | $272,235 |
40 | Kelley Hot Spring Fish Inc. | Canby, CA 96015 | $266,885 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”