SELECT * FROM cd_m2019 WHERE fips='CA02' AND progcode='total_mfp ' AND `rank`>=1 LIMIT 0,20

Total Market Facilitation Program in 2nd District of California (Rep. Jared Huffman), 2019‡

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 105

Recipients of Total Market Facilitation Program from farms in 2nd District of California (Rep. Jared Huffman) totaled $1,201,000 in in 2019‡.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Market Facilitation Program
2019
1Alexandre Dairy/alexandre Eco Dai *Crescent City, CA 95531$44,523
2Reservation Ranch *Smith River, CA 95567$40,357
3Moreda Valley Dairy *Petaluma, CA 94952$38,954
4Debernardi Dairy Inc *Petaluma, CA 94952$37,616
5Renati Dairy *Petaluma, CA 94952$35,276
6Mcclellands Dairy *Petaluma, CA 94952$34,709
7Renner Ranches Inc *Loleta, CA 95551$33,971
8Miranda Dairy *Ferndale, CA 95536$33,561
9Spaletta Ranch *Petaluma, CA 94952$32,467
10Ronald E Wilson Dba Diamond W DaiPetaluma, CA 94952$31,812
11Mccall Dairy *Petaluma, CA 94952$29,429
12Lafranchi Ranch *Nicasio, CA 94946$27,968
13Neil Mcisaac & Son Inc *Tomales, CA 94971$26,048
14Bordessa Family Dairies Gp *Valley Ford, CA 94972$25,540
15Cypress Lane Ranch *Petaluma, CA 94952$25,441
16Bucher Farms Inc *Healdsburg, CA 95448$25,212
17Alexandre Acres/sea-mist Organics *Crescent City, CA 95531$20,435
18Walter Stornetta Ranch *Manchester, CA 95459$19,886
19Robert Camozzi IIPetaluma, CA 94952$18,782
20Gerald Spaletta Dairy *Petaluma, CA 94975$18,471

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

‡ Data for 2020 includes payments made by USDA through June 30, 2020 and does not include crop insurance premium subsidies.

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag