Total Commodity Programs in 2nd District of California (Rep. Jared Huffman), 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 810

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 2nd District of California (Rep. Jared Huffman) totaled $52,334,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
1995-2021
1Alexandre Dairy/alexandre Eco DairyCrescent City, CA 95531$1,879,738
2Renner Ranches IncLoleta, CA 95551$1,166,049
3Miranda DairyFerndale, CA 95536$1,007,627
4Diamond R RanchFerndale, CA 95536$819,454
5Alexandre Acres/sea-mist OrganicsCrescent City, CA 95531$808,181
6James WalkerFerndale, CA 95536$755,610
7Palmer Westbrook IncSmith River, CA 95567$746,003
8Steve ScilacciFortuna, CA 95540$722,354
9Lafranchi RanchNicasio, CA 94946$721,745
10Frank J LeonardoFerndale, CA 95536$643,961
11Dennis LeonardiFerndale, CA 95536$602,115
12Kehoe Dairy IncInverness, CA 94937$602,005
13Cypress Lane RanchPetaluma, CA 94952$588,789
14James M O'neil Revocable Trust - James M O'neilLoleta, CA 95551$585,917
15Robert Giacomini Dairy IncPoint Reyes Station, CA 94956$570,286
16Mcclure Dairy IncInverness, CA 94937$556,045
17Moretti Family DairyPetaluma, CA 94952$542,542
18Spaletta DairyPoint Reyes Station, CA 94956$536,295
19Frank BoldriniFerndale, CA 95536$524,458
20Regli Jersey's - James P RegliFerndale, CA 95536$506,290

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag