SELECT * FROM cd_m2019 WHERE fips='CA02' AND progcode='totalfarm ' AND `rank`>=1 LIMIT 0,20

Subtotal, Farming Subsidies in 2nd District of California (Rep. Jared Huffman), 2019‡

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 118

Recipients of Subtotal, Farming Subsidies from farms in 2nd District of California (Rep. Jared Huffman) totaled $3,398,000 in in 2019‡.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Subtotal, Farming Subsidies
2019
1Alexandre Dairy/alexandre Eco Dai *Crescent City, CA 95531$95,331
2Moreda Valley Dairy *Petaluma, CA 94952$90,964
3Renner Ranches Inc *Loleta, CA 95551$85,933
4Bordessa Family Dairies Gp *Valley Ford, CA 94972$77,525
5Reservation Ranch *Smith River, CA 95567$65,761
6Debernardi Dairy Inc *Petaluma, CA 94952$63,608
7Spaletta Ranch *Petaluma, CA 94952$62,744
8Alexandre Acres/sea-mist Organics *Crescent City, CA 95531$61,929
9Renati Dairy *Petaluma, CA 94952$60,681
10Ronald E Wilson Dba Diamond W DaiPetaluma, CA 94952$59,100
11Miranda Dairy *Ferndale, CA 95536$58,965
12Mccall Dairy *Petaluma, CA 94952$55,423
13Robert Camozzi IIPetaluma, CA 94952$54,135
14Lafranchi Ranch *Nicasio, CA 94946$53,933
15Neil Mcisaac & Son Inc *Tomales, CA 94971$51,452
16Cypress Lane Ranch *Petaluma, CA 94952$51,412
17Bucher Farms Inc *Healdsburg, CA 95448$51,224
18Diamond R Ranch *Ferndale, CA 95536$47,421
19Walter Stornetta Ranch *Manchester, CA 95459$45,848
20Gerald Spaletta Dairy *Petaluma, CA 94975$44,468

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

‡ Data for 2020 includes payments made by USDA through June 30, 2020 and does not include crop insurance premium subsidies.

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag