SELECT * FROM cd_mtotal WHERE fips='CA16' AND progcode='total_mfp ' AND `rank`>=1 LIMIT 0,20

Total Market Facilitation Program in 16th District of California (Rep. Jim Costa), 1995-2020‡

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,139

Recipients of Total Market Facilitation Program from farms in 16th District of California (Rep. Jim Costa) totaled $62,990,000 in from 1995-2020‡.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Market Facilitation Program
1David Santos Farming *Los Banos, CA 93635$753,785
2Tri Iest Dairy *Madera, CA 93637$659,713
3Vander Woude Dairy *Merced, CA 95341$568,365
4Gregory D Hooker Diamond H DairyChowchilla, CA 93610$553,394
5Double Diamond Dairy & Ranch *El Nido, CA 95317$551,081
6A-bar Ag Enterprises *Firebaugh, CA 93622$527,443
7Joe Soares Dairy *Delhi, CA 95315$475,951
8Tony L Lopes Dairy Lp *Gustine, CA 95322$443,866
9Hillcrest Dairy Lp *Le Grand, CA 95333$443,751
10Hoogendam Dairy *Merced, CA 95341$442,356
11Silveira Brothers Dairy *Gustine, CA 95322$431,646
12Iest Family Farms *Madera, CA 93637$430,301
13De Jager Dairy North *Chowchilla, CA 93610$429,326
14Teixeira And Sons, LLCLos Banos, CA 93635$416,322
15Capstone Ranch Lp *Madera, CA 93637$400,178
16Creekside Farming Company IncMadera, CA 93637$375,000
17Wl Goodman & Sons *Dos Palos, CA 93620$372,801
18John B Pires And Eldred C Pires P *Gustine, CA 95322$371,883
19Fagundes Fagundes Fagundes *Merced, CA 95348$370,262
20Gallo Cattle Company Lp *Atwater, CA 95301$364,666

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

‡ Data for 2020 includes payments made by USDA through June 30, 2020 and does not include crop insurance premium subsidies.


Farm Subsidies Education