Farm Subsidy information
2nd District of Colorado
(Rep. Joe Neguse)
Total Subsidies in 2nd District of Colorado (Rep. Joe Neguse), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 112
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 2nd District of Colorado (Rep. Joe Neguse) totaled $4,050,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Knapp Ranch LLC | Parshall, CO 80468 | $48,326 |
22 | Metro Docheff Jr | Parshall, CO 80468 | $46,603 |
23 | Gary Dean Vaughan | Fort Laramie, WY 82212 | $39,846 |
24 | James L Ellison | Bond, CO 80423 | $36,160 |
25 | Darwin Scholl | Kremmling, CO 80459 | $32,743 |
26 | Tom Hill | Kremmling, CO 80459 | $32,141 |
27 | W Diamond Ranch | Kremmling, CO 80459 | $30,978 |
28 | Leroux Land & Cattle LLC | Windsor, CO 80550 | $30,659 |
29 | Knapp Ranch Partnership | Boulder, CO 80304 | $21,088 |
30 | George Read | Crawford, NE 69339 | $20,427 |
31 | Trey Linke | Granby, CO 80446 | $18,841 |
32 | Jennifer Baker | Granby, CO 80446 | $17,883 |
33 | Confluence Energy LLC | Kremmling, CO 80459 | $17,833 |
34 | Mace Mcvay Trucking | Kremmling, CO 80459 | $17,297 |
35 | Wood Cattle Co LLC | Parshall, CO 80468 | $16,783 |
36 | Dwayne A Uhrich | Kremmling, CO 80459 | $16,710 |
37 | Raymond Petersen | Kremmling, CO 80459 | $16,547 |
38 | Crown Royal Cattle Co | Parshall, CO 80468 | $14,945 |
39 | Hubert D Hahn | Hot Sulphur Springs, CO 80451 | $14,391 |
40 | Conway Farrell | Parshall, CO 80468 | $13,676 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”