Farm Subsidy information
2nd District of Colorado
(Rep. Joe Neguse)
Total Subsidies in 2nd District of Colorado (Rep. Joe Neguse), 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 30
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 2nd District of Colorado (Rep. Joe Neguse) totaled $1,097,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Farrell Livestock LLC | Parshall, CO 80468 | $313,417 |
2 | Peak Ranch Inc | Kremmling, CO 80459 | $154,610 |
3 | Jodi Hill | Kremmling, CO 80459 | $69,670 |
4 | Ritschard Cattle Company LLC | Kremmling, CO 80459 | $65,945 |
5 | Bumgarner Ranches Inc | Kremmling, CO 80459 | $65,394 |
6 | Jerry Eller | Kremmling, CO 80459 | $49,907 |
7 | Troublesome Valley Ranch Lllp | Kremmling, CO 80459 | $49,170 |
8 | Yust Cattle Company Inc | Kremmling, CO 80459 | $42,912 |
9 | Bruchez & Sons LLC | Kremmling, CO 80459 | $41,866 |
10 | Linke Cattle Ranch LLC | Granby, CO 80446 | $35,480 |
11 | Mark Davison | Kremmling, CO 80459 | $30,393 |
12 | Terry R Pryor | Kremmling, CO 80459 | $27,480 |
13 | Monte K Linke | Hot Sulphur Springs, CO 80451 | $23,883 |
14 | Leroux Land & Cattle LLC | Windsor, CO 80550 | $19,048 |
15 | Taussig Ranch Inc | Kremmling, CO 80459 | $18,227 |
16 | John M Colburn | Kremmling, CO 80459 | $16,477 |
17 | Wood Cattle Co LLC | Parshall, CO 80468 | $14,245 |
18 | Trey Linke | Granby, CO 80446 | $11,781 |
19 | Raymond Petersen | Kremmling, CO 80459 | $8,943 |
20 | Clovis Pryor | Kremmling, CO 80459 | $8,431 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>