Total Commodity Programs in 3rd District of Colorado (Rep. Scott Tipton), 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 7,694

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 3rd District of Colorado (Rep. Scott Tipton) totaled $261,891,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
1995-2021
1Farm Services Agency **Washington, DC 20250$1,662,402
2Martinez Farms LLCAlamosa, CO 81101$1,645,649
3Mitchell Ag Production FlpMonte Vista, CO 81144$1,522,438
4Price Farms LLCCenter, CO 81125$1,480,838
5Upper Valley Holsteins IncAustin, CO 81410$1,421,841
6Nottingham Land & Livestock LllpCraig, CO 81626$1,411,773
7Zapata Seed CompanyHooper, CO 81136$1,406,681
8Mike Mitchell Farms LLCMonte Vista, CO 81144$1,398,556
9Ute Mountain Ute Farm & Ranch EntTowaoc, CO 81334$1,397,164
10Bret GrandboucheCraig, CO 81625$1,393,355
11Van Treese Farms IncMonte Vista, CO 81144$1,384,390
12Richard RamstetterCenter, CO 81125$1,346,606
13Worley Family Farms, LLCMonte Vista, CO 81144$1,248,200
14Pro-seed IncCenter, CO 81125$1,230,149
15Crestone View Farms LLCCenter, CO 81125$1,227,897
16Three S RanchBlanca, CO 81123$1,202,043
17Kelby Pepper /dba Kelby Pepper FarmsCenter, CO 81125$1,166,185
18David Faucette Farms LLCSanford, CO 81151$1,134,220
19M & M Grain And Produce LLCCenter, CO 81125$1,113,341
20J D S Farms LLCMonte Vista, CO 81144$1,073,432

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag