Farm Subsidy information
2nd District of Florida
(Rep. Neal Dunn)
Total Subsidies in 2nd District of Florida (Rep. Neal Dunn), 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 847
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 2nd District of Florida (Rep. Neal Dunn) totaled $42,728,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | White Oak Dairy Inc | Mayo, FL 32066 | $1,113,245 |
| 2 | Triple L Cattle Company LLC | Mayo, FL 32066 | $990,985 |
| 3 | Peoples South Bank ** | Greenwood, FL 32443 | $852,450 |
| 4 | Vanlandingham Farms Inc | Quincy, FL 32351 | $687,719 |
| 5 | Larry And Carolyn Baggett | Marianna, FL 32448 | $660,246 |
| 6 | North American Farms Inc | Bascom, FL 32423 | $592,596 |
| 7 | Herman H Sanchez III | Old Town, FL 32680 | $561,706 |
| 8 | Melvin & Carolyn Adams | Graceville, FL 32440 | $497,519 |
| 9 | Craig Bishop Farms Inc | Marianna, FL 32448 | $491,265 |
| 10 | Kelby Sanchez | Old Town, FL 32680 | $469,376 |
| 11 | First State Bank Of Blakely ** | Colquitt, GA 39837 | $468,487 |
| 12 | Pittman Jeff C And Ginger W | Bascom, FL 32423 | $458,239 |
| 13 | Forrester Produce Inc | Columbia, AL 36319 | $435,589 |
| 14 | Farm Credit Of Northwest Florida ** | Marianna, FL 32447 | $429,410 |
| 15 | Ethan Davis Peacock | Altha, FL 32421 | $422,455 |
| 16 | Veit Farms, LLC | Chipley, FL 32428 | $421,990 |
| 17 | Michael H & Lanesia Davis | Graceville, FL 32440 | $414,274 |
| 18 | Lad Farms Inc | Greenwood, FL 32443 | $389,583 |
| 19 | Dorothy Anne Ward | Blountstown, FL 32424 | $382,081 |
| 20 | Herman Sanchez Jr | Old Town, FL 32680 | $376,625 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf