Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in 2nd District of Florida (Rep. Neal Dunn), 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 630

Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in 2nd District of Florida (Rep. Neal Dunn) totaled $62,506,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC)
1995-2021
1Peoples South Bank **Greenwood, FL 32443$2,319,877
2Larry And Carolyn BaggettMarianna, FL 32448$1,284,870
3Michael H & Lanesia DavisGraceville, FL 32440$1,193,752
4First State Bank Of Blakely **Colquitt, GA 39837$1,067,910
5Spring Creek Farming CompanyDothan, AL 36305$1,055,113
6Pittman Jeff C And Ginger WBascom, FL 32423$875,559
7Melton FarmsAltha, FL 32421$847,707
8First Port City Bank **Donalsonville, GA 39845$841,697
9Farm Credit Of Northwest Florida **Marianna, FL 32447$810,320
10Shaw FarmsMayo, FL 32066$731,673
11Ethan Davis PeacockAltha, FL 32421$729,723
12Davis Bennie E & TeresaCottondale, FL 32431$723,762
13W David PhillipsGraceville, FL 32440$693,476
14Eddie A RegisterGraceville, FL 32440$663,181
15Dorothy Anne WardBlountstown, FL 32424$644,492
16Greg BryantBellwood, AL 36313$643,354
17Gary Burdette WardBlountstown, FL 32424$643,187
18Williams Travis Scott And KimGraceville, FL 32440$635,608
19Forrester Produce IncColumbia, AL 36319$627,914
20Mark PeacockAltha, FL 32421$617,204

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag