Emergency Conservation Program in 11th District of Florida (Rep. Daniel Webster), 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 57
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in 11th District of Florida (Rep. Daniel Webster) totaled $1,543,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Eagle Nest Ranch LLC | Tampa, FL 33625 | $198,680 |
2 | Ventura Ranch LLC | Lake Panasoffkee, FL 33538 | $191,798 |
3 | Doug Lancaster Farms, Inc | Center Hill, FL 33514 | $171,554 |
4 | Robert Walker | Lakeland, FL 33804 | $156,956 |
5 | Barbara Ellis Shelley | Apopka, FL 32712 | $68,151 |
6 | Jamie D Sanders | Wildwood, FL 34785 | $57,015 |
7 | R M Wade | Wildwood, FL 34785 | $49,346 |
8 | Jam Cattle Company LLC | The Villages, FL 32163 | $44,996 |
9 | Lbf Ranch LLC | Lakeland, FL 33813 | $40,382 |
10 | Clyde S Bexley | Oxford, FL 34484 | $36,875 |
11 | John Graham | Webster, FL 33597 | $32,008 |
12 | Revels Farm Service Inc | Bushnell, FL 33513 | $31,882 |
13 | Marvin Lamar Parker | Webster, FL 33597 | $28,086 |
14 | Rita Van Nostran | Webster, FL 33597 | $25,292 |
15 | William R Richardson | Wildwood, FL 34785 | $24,634 |
16 | John W Mcelveen III | Webster, FL 33597 | $24,141 |
17 | Benjamin C Williams | Webster, FL 33597 | $19,542 |
18 | L & K Partnership Of Florida, LLC | Sumterville, FL 33585 | $19,421 |
19 | Wells Family Ent Lllp | Lake Panasoffkee, FL 33538 | $18,379 |
20 | Dixon Farm C/o Franklin Dixon | Bushnell, FL 33513 | $17,282 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>