Farm Subsidy information
18th District of Florida
(Rep. Brian Mast)
Total Subsidies in 18th District of Florida (Rep. Brian Mast), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 638
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 18th District of Florida (Rep. Brian Mast) totaled $100,018,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 41 | Mabel Groves Limited | Orlando, FL 32856 | $443,459 |
| 42 | Tradition Development Company | Fort Lauderdale, FL 33310 | $429,300 |
| 43 | Ru-mar Inc | Fort Pierce, FL 34947 | $426,846 |
| 44 | Martin Properties Of Palm Beach C | Boynton Beach, FL 33436 | $411,899 |
| 45 | Double George Groves | Vero Beach, FL 32961 | $402,895 |
| 46 | Ru-mar Inc | Fort Pierce, FL 34945 | $390,936 |
| 47 | The Packers Of Indian River Ltd | Vero Beach, FL 32960 | $370,750 |
| 48 | Triple C Groves Llp | Delray Beach, FL 33448 | $364,580 |
| 49 | Howard J Beville Jr | Fort Pierce, FL 34945 | $360,590 |
| 50 | Gates Brothers | Fort Pierce, FL 34948 | $354,074 |
| 51 | B M B Groves Inc | Vero Beach, FL 32962 | $339,384 |
| 52 | Hbh Groves LLC | Winter Garden, FL 34777 | $329,889 |
| 53 | Buck Hammock Groves Inc | Fort Pierce, FL 34951 | $328,832 |
| 54 | Tadala's Nursery Inc | Southwest Ranches, FL 33332 | $327,710 |
| 55 | Triple K Groves Ltd | Melbourne Beach, FL 32951 | $321,966 |
| 56 | Shamrock Groves Llp | Fort Pierce, FL 34946 | $320,638 |
| 57 | Estes Groves Inc | Vero Beach, FL 32960 | $318,136 |
| 58 | Dms Groves LLC | Vero Beach, FL 32960 | $317,548 |
| 59 | Hammock Groves | Fort Pierce, FL 34954 | $315,445 |
| 60 | Riverside Citrus Harvesting LLC | Fort Pierce, FL 34954 | $313,873 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf